Table of Contents
Understanding PQQ Tenders
Pre-Qualification Questionnaires are an important first step in many procurement processes, especially in construction and public sector contracts. They serve as a screening mechanism to identify the best suppliers before the full tender stage.
Definition of PQQ Tender
A PQQ (Pre-Qualification Questionnaire) tender is a preliminary assessment document used to evaluate suppliers’ capabilities before inviting them to submit full tender responses. This document serves as the initial screening stage in the procurement process, particularly common in public sector and construction contracts.
PQQs go by various names including Selection Questionnaires (SQ), Stage 1 Tenders, and European Single Procurement Documents (ESPD). Despite the different terminology, they all serve the same fundamental purpose: to shortlist qualified candidates.
The document requires potential suppliers to demonstrate their suitability across multiple criteria before being considered for the actual tender stage. This two-stage approach helps procurement teams efficiently identify contractors with the appropriate qualifications and experience.
Key Elements of a PQQ
Most PQQs contain several standard sections designed to thoroughly assess your company’s capability to deliver the contract:
Company Information
Basic details about your organisation
Company structure and registration information
Financial standing and stability
Technical Capability
Relevant experience and past performance
Staff qualifications and expertise
Quality management systems
Compliance Requirements
Health and safety policies
Environmental management
Equal opportunities and diversity policies
Supporting evidence is essential when completing a PQQ. Instead of simply stating capabilities, provide documentation and specific examples that demonstrate your claims.
This evidence-based approach allows evaluators to make objective assessments of your suitability.
Purpose in Procurement
The primary purpose of PQQs in the tendering process is to create efficiency by filtering out unsuitable suppliers early. This saves time and resources for both buyers and suppliers by ensuring only qualified candidates proceed to the detailed tender stage.
For procurement teams, PQQs help reduce the administrative burden of reviewing full tenders from unqualified suppliers. They also ensure all shortlisted companies meet minimum standards and create a level playing field for evaluation.
For you as a supplier, understanding PQQs offers strategic advantages. A well-completed PQQ demonstrates your professionalism and attention to detail.
It also gives you the opportunity to highlight your strengths and relevant experience before the more competitive tender stage.
PQQs are particularly valuable in complex sectors like construction, where technical capability and compliance are critical to project success.
Stages of the PQQ Tender Process
The PQQ tender process follows a structured pathway designed to identify the best suppliers for a contract. Understanding each stage is vital for organisations looking to successfully navigate the procurement journey.
Pre-Qualification Stage
The Pre-Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ) serves as the initial screening mechanism in the tender process. At this stage, buyers assess your basic eligibility to fulfil the contract requirements before inviting you to submit a full tender.
The PQQ typically requests information about:
Company background and structure
Financial standing and stability
Relevant experience and past performance
Technical capabilities and resources
Health and safety policies
Environmental management systems
Quality assurance processes
This stage helps buyers filter out unsuitable suppliers early, saving time and resources for both parties. To maximise your chances of success, maintain up-to-date documentation and prepare standard responses to common questions that can be quickly adapted for specific requirements.
Consider creating a bid-ready library containing frequently requested documents such as company policies, certificates, and case studies.
Supplier Selection
Once you’ve submitted your PQQ, the buyer evaluates responses against predetermined criteria to create a shortlist of qualified suppliers. This selection process typically involves a scoring system where your responses are rated based on how well they meet the specified requirements.
Key factors influencing supplier selection include:
Financial stability and capability
Technical competence and expertise
Relevant experience with similar contracts
Compliance with industry regulations
Quality management systems
Risk assessment approaches
Multiple stakeholders from the buying organisation may assess different aspects of your submission. Only suppliers who meet or exceed the minimum threshold score will progress to the next stage.
Highlight your unique selling points clearly. Use quantifiable evidence and specific examples rather than general statements.
Invitation to Tender (ITT)
If you successfully pass the PQQ stage, you’ll receive an Invitation to Tender (ITT). At this stage, the procurement process becomes more detailed and competitive.
The ITT contains comprehensive information about the contract requirements and how your response will be evaluated. Typical ITT components include:
Detailed specification of goods/services required
Contract terms and conditions
Pricing schedules and requirements
Evaluation criteria and weightings
Response format instructions
Submission deadlines
Unlike the PQQ stage which focuses on capability and compliance, the ITT evaluates your specific approach to delivering the contract. This includes methodology, innovation, quality standards, and value for money.
The ITT often requires you to demonstrate how you’ll meet the buyer’s objectives through a tailored solution. Review the evaluation criteria carefully to understand what aspects of your proposal will carry the most weight in scoring.
Tender Submission
Your tender submission represents your opportunity to present a compelling case for contract award. This stage requires careful attention to detail and strict adherence to the submission guidelines.
When preparing your tender submission:
Follow instructions precisely – Format, word counts, and submission methods must comply with requirements
Address all criteria – Ensure you respond to every question and requirement
Provide evidence – Support claims with concrete examples, data, and references
Highlight value – Demonstrate how your solution delivers best value, not just lowest cost
Quality check – Review for errors, clarity, and completeness
Your submission should be clear, concise, and professionally presented. Use headings, bullet points, and tables to organise information logically and make key points stand out.
Submit well before the deadline to avoid technical issues or last-minute complications. Late submissions are typically rejected regardless of quality or value.
Evaluation Criteria for PQQs
PQQ evaluation criteria establish a standardised framework to assess bidders’ suitability before inviting them to tender. These criteria typically focus on three main areas that determine whether your organisation meets the minimum requirements to proceed to the ITT stage.
Mandatory and Discretionary Exclusion
Public procurement regulations require buyers to exclude bidders with certain convictions or legal issues. Mandatory exclusions include criminal offences such as fraud, corruption, money laundering, or terrorist offences.
If your organisation has been convicted of these, you’ll be automatically disqualified. Discretionary exclusions give buyers flexibility to reject bidders for less severe issues.
These might include:
Violation of environmental or social obligations
Bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings
Grave professional misconduct
Agreements with other economic operators to distort competition
Significant or persistent deficiencies in prior public contracts
You must provide declarations confirming your organisation isn’t subject to these exclusions. False declarations can result in immediate disqualification and potential legal consequences.
Economic and Financial Standing
Contracting authorities need assurance that your organisation is financially stable enough to deliver the contract. This assessment typically examines:
Minimum turnover requirements (usually proportionate to contract value)
Financial ratios (liquidity, solvency, profitability)
Evidence of appropriate insurance coverage
Financial statements for the past 2-3 years
Your financial standing will be evaluated to ensure you have sufficient resources to fulfil contractual obligations. Public bodies often use scoring matrices to assess financial stability, with thresholds appropriate to the contract’s value and risk profile.
Many PQQs require a minimum turnover of 1.5-2 times the annual contract value. If you’re a newer business without extensive financial history, alternative evidence like business plans or bank statements may be acceptable.
Technical and Professional Ability
This section evaluates your organisation’s capability to deliver the required services or products. The assessment typically includes:
Relevant experience through similar contracts in the past 3-5 years
Technical resources and equipment available
Staff qualifications and professional certifications
Quality assurance systems and processes
Environmental management measures
Provide evidence through case studies, testimonials, or references from previous clients. Focus on contracts of similar scope, value, and complexity to demonstrate your relevant expertise.
Most PQQs use a scoring system (often 0-5) for technical criteria, with minimum thresholds for proceeding to the tender stage. The weightings typically favour technical ability (70-75%) over financial considerations (25-30%), reflecting the importance of quality and capability in public procurement.
Standardisation and Best Practice
The procurement landscape for PQQs has evolved significantly with established frameworks and standards simplifying the tendering process. These standardised approaches reduce administrative burden whilst ensuring consistent quality assessment across the construction industry.
PAS 91 and Its Withdrawal
PAS 91 was developed by the British Standards Institute as a standardised pre-qualification questionnaire specifically for the construction industry. This document streamlined procurement by creating a common format that both buyers and suppliers recognised, reducing the time and resources needed to complete multiple different questionnaires.
In 2020, PAS 91 was withdrawn and no longer receives updates. Many organisations had already built their PQQ processes around this framework, creating a familiar structure covering:
Company information
Financial details
Health and safety policies
Environmental management
Quality assurance systems
Equal opportunities and diversity policies
Despite its withdrawal, many PQQs still follow the PAS 91 structure as it established effective standardisation principles that remain relevant today.
British Standards Institute (BSI) and Compliance
The BSI continues to play a crucial role in establishing procurement standards and best practices. When completing PQQs, you’ll often need to demonstrate compliance with specific BSI standards relevant to your industry sector.
Key BSI standards frequently referenced in construction PQQs include:
ISO 9001 (Quality Management)
ISO 14001 (Environmental Management)
ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety)
Evidence of BSI certification gives clients confidence in your organisation’s processes and capabilities. When responding to these sections, clearly document your certification status and implementation practices.
BSI also provides guidance on procurement best practices that influence how buyers structure their PQQs. Understanding these standards helps you align your responses with evaluators’ expectations.
The Common Assessment Standard
The Common Assessment Standard represents the construction industry’s response to PAS 91’s withdrawal. Developed by Build UK and the Civil Engineering Contractors Association, it creates a unified pre-qualification system accepted by major contractors and clients.
The standard is available at two levels:
Desktop assessment: Document-based verification
Site assessment: Includes physical site verification
Accreditation bodies like Constructionline, CHAS, and Achilles can certify companies against this standard. Once certified, you can use this qualification across multiple tender opportunities, significantly reducing duplication of effort.
The Common Assessment Standard covers 12 key categories including financial information, environmental management, and quality management. By achieving this certification, you demonstrate compliance with industry requirements and enhance your credibility when bidding for contracts.
Sector-Specific Considerations in Construction Procurement
The construction industry has distinctive procurement practices that reflect its unique operational challenges and regulatory requirements. PQQ processes in construction specifically address technical competencies, health and safety records, and financial stability relevant to building projects.
Unique PQQ Requirements in Construction
Construction PQQs often demand more detailed evidence of technical capabilities than other sectors. You’ll need to provide comprehensive health and safety policies, as construction sites present significant risks requiring careful management.
Your accident records and safety certifications will be scrutinised closely, particularly CHAS accreditations or similar safety schemes. Evidence of previous similar projects is crucial, with evaluators looking for comparable scale, complexity and successful delivery.
Financial stability checks are typically more stringent for construction tenders, often requiring higher turnover thresholds relative to contract value. This reflects the capital-intensive nature of construction projects and the risk of contractor insolvency.
Construction PQQs frequently request specific professional qualifications and memberships relevant to building trades that do not apply in other industries.
Works Contracts and Subcontractors
Works contracts in construction have distinct PQQ elements that focus on supply chain management and subcontractor relationships. The 2023 Procurement Act and PPN 03/24 aim to simplify the tendering process for construction subcontractors.
You must demonstrate robust systems for managing subcontractors, including vetting processes, payment practices, and quality control measures. Many public sector clients now require evidence of fair payment terms for subcontractors, particularly the 30-day payment commitment.
Construction PQQs evaluate your experience in coordinating multiple specialist trades and managing complex project interfaces. You need to show how you have successfully integrated various subcontractors on previous projects.
Frameworks and Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS) have become increasingly common in construction procurement. These require specific approaches to qualification that allow for ongoing contractor addition.
Role of Contractors and SMEs
Recent procurement reforms, including PPN 03/24 and the Procurement Act 2023, target making tenders more accessible to SMEs in construction. Qualification requirements are now often scaled proportionately to contract size.
If you are an SME, you can benefit from simplified PQQ processes that reduce administrative burden and create more level playing fields. Some requirements allow self-certification instead of extensive documentation.
Main contractors face increasing scrutiny of their SME engagement strategies in PQQs. You must demonstrate how your procurement approach supports smaller businesses in your supply chain.
Public sector buyers often include social value requirements in construction PQQs. They assess how contractors will deliver community benefits, environmental improvements, or local employment opportunities alongside the physical works.
Standardisation and Best Practice
The procurement landscape for PQQs has evolved significantly with established frameworks and standards simplifying the tendering process. These standardised approaches reduce administrative burden whilst ensuring consistent quality assessment across the construction industry.
PAS 91 and Its Withdrawal
PAS 91 was developed by the British Standards Institute as a standardised pre-qualification questionnaire specifically for the construction industry. This document streamlined procurement by creating a common format that both buyers and suppliers recognised, reducing the time and resources needed to complete multiple different questionnaires.
In 2020, PAS 91 was withdrawn and no longer receives updates. Many organisations had already built their PQQ processes around this framework, creating a familiar structure covering:
Company information
Financial details
Health and safety policies
Environmental management
Quality assurance systems
Equal opportunities and diversity policies
Despite its withdrawal, many PQQs still follow the PAS 91 structure as it established effective standardisation principles that remain relevant today.
British Standards Institute (BSI) and Compliance
The BSI continues to play a crucial role in establishing procurement standards and best practices. When completing PQQs, you’ll often need to demonstrate compliance with specific BSI standards relevant to your industry sector.
Key BSI standards frequently referenced in construction PQQs include:
ISO 9001 (Quality Management)
ISO 14001 (Environmental Management)
ISO 45001 (Occupational Health and Safety)
Evidence of BSI certification gives clients confidence in your organisation’s processes and capabilities. When responding to these sections, clearly document your certification status and implementation practices.
BSI also provides guidance on procurement best practices that influence how buyers structure their PQQs. Understanding these standards helps you align your responses with evaluators’ expectations.
The Common Assessment Standard
The Common Assessment Standard represents the construction industry’s response to PAS 91’s withdrawal. Developed by Build UK and the Civil Engineering Contractors Association, it creates a unified pre-qualification system accepted by major contractors and clients.
The standard is available at two levels:
Desktop assessment: Document-based verification
Site assessment: Includes physical site verification
Accreditation bodies like Constructionline, CHAS, and Achilles can certify companies against this standard. Once certified, you can use this qualification across multiple tender opportunities, significantly reducing duplication of effort.
The Common Assessment Standard covers 12 key categories including financial information, environmental management, and quality management. By achieving this certification, you demonstrate compliance with industry requirements and enhance your credibility when bidding for contracts.
Compliance Areas Within PQQs
Pre-Qualification Questionnaires evaluate several compliance areas to ensure suppliers meet industry standards before proceeding to the tender stage. These assessments help clients identify partners who maintain appropriate safety measures, environmental practices, quality standards, and technical capabilities.
Health and Safety Standards
Health and safety compliance forms a cornerstone of most PQQs, particularly in high-risk industries like construction. Buyers need assurance that you have robust safety management systems in place to protect workers and the public.
Your PQQ responses typically need to demonstrate:
Valid health and safety policies with regular reviews
Risk assessment procedures and documentation
Accident reporting protocols and historical safety records
Staff training programmes and qualifications
SSIP (Safety Schemes in Procurement) accreditations such as CHAS or SafeContractor
Worksafe PQQ certification builds upon SSIP accreditation, showing you have achieved industry-leading best practices in health and safety compliance. Evidence of low accident rates and comprehensive safety management systems strengthens your PQQ submission.
Environmental Policy and Sustainability
Environmental compliance has become increasingly important in procurement decisions, reflecting broader societal concerns about sustainability. Your PQQ responses must showcase your commitment to environmental responsibility.
Key elements to address include:
Environmental management systems (ISO 14001 certification is advantageous)
Carbon reduction initiatives and targets
Waste management and recycling programmes
Sustainable sourcing practices
Compliance with environmental regulations
Buyers expect detailed information about how you measure and reduce environmental impacts throughout your operations. This might include data on carbon footprint, waste diversion rates, or use of renewable energy.
Your responses should highlight practical examples of environmental initiatives. Demonstrating continuous improvement in environmental performance can differentiate your submission from competitors.
Quality Assurance and Certifications
Quality assurance elements in PQQs evaluate your ability to deliver consistent, high-standard products or services. This section examines your quality management systems and relevant industry certifications.
Key Components Include:
Quality management systems (ISO 9001 certification)
Industry-specific qualifications and accreditations
Quality control procedures and documentation
Continuous improvement methodologies
Customer satisfaction measurement
You should provide evidence of how quality is embedded in your operational processes. Case studies demonstrating successful project delivery that met or exceeded quality expectations can strengthen your submission.
Many sectors have specific quality standards that you must comply with. For construction, PAS91 serves as a standardised pre-qualification assessment that includes quality management requirements.
ICT Requirements
Information and Communication Technology requirements assess your technical capabilities and cybersecurity measures. This increasingly important area reflects growing concerns about data protection and digital resilience.
Your PQQ responses should address:
IT infrastructure capabilities and reliability
Data protection policies and GDPR compliance
Cybersecurity measures and certifications
Business continuity and disaster recovery plans
Digital skills and technical competencies
Evidence of Cyber Essentials certification or ISO 27001 compliance can strengthen your submission. You should also demonstrate how your ICT systems support efficient project delivery and client communication.
If you handle sensitive information, buyers will scrutinise your data handling protocols and security measures. Clear documentation of regular security testing and staff training on data protection helps establish your credibility.
PQQ Tenders in UK Public Procurement
Pre-Qualification Questionnaires (PQQs) form a first step in the UK public procurement process. They serve as screening mechanisms to ensure only qualified suppliers progress to the full tender stage, saving time and resources for both buyers and suppliers.
Role of the Contracting Authority
The contracting authority manages the entire PQQ process in UK public procurement. They design questionnaires that assess suppliers’ financial standing, technical capability, and compliance with relevant regulations.
Contracting authorities must follow strict guidelines under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. They ensure the PQQ process is transparent, non-discriminatory, and proportionate to the contract’s requirements.
Authorities use standardised forms, including the Standard Selection Questionnaire (SQ), which replaced traditional PQQs in many scenarios. This standardisation helps reduce the administrative burden on suppliers bidding for multiple contracts.
Authorities provide clear evaluation criteria and sufficient time for suppliers to complete submissions. They also offer feedback to unsuccessful candidates to support improvement in future bids.
Defence and Security Sector (MOD)
The Ministry of Defence (MOD) operates specialised PQQ processes tailored to defence and security needs. These PQQs often include additional requirements around security clearances, confidentiality protocols, and technical specifications.
The Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 govern MOD procurement, allowing for stricter criteria than standard public procurement. You will encounter more detailed questions about your company’s security measures and personnel vetting processes.
MOD PQQs typically assess:
Security capabilities: Physical, personnel, and cyber security arrangements
Supply chain resilience: Ability to maintain service during crises
Technical competence: Specialist capabilities relevant to defence requirements
The MOD frequently uses multi-stage qualification processes for complex contracts. Early engagement with defence procurement portals like Defence Contracts Online (DCO) is essential for accessing these opportunities.
SMEs in Public Sector Tenders
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) face unique challenges when tackling PQQs in public procurement. The UK government has implemented measures to increase SME participation, including simplifying PQQ requirements for lower-value contracts.
You can benefit from the removal of PQQs for contracts below certain thresholds (typically under £118,000). This policy aims to reduce barriers to entry and administrative burdens that disproportionately affect smaller businesses.
Many contracting authorities offer guidance specifically for SMEs and sometimes hold pre-tender briefings. Consider forming consortia with complementary businesses if your company lacks certain capabilities or financial standing.
Framework agreements provide excellent entry points, requiring qualification once for multiple contract opportunities. Public sector buyers increasingly value local economic benefits and environmental sustainability, areas where many SMEs excel and can gain competitive advantage.
