Table of Contents
Winning public sector contracts can transform your business, opening doors to stable, long-term revenue streams that private sector work often cannot match. Yet many SMEs find the tendering process daunting, with complex documentation and fierce competition creating significant barriers to entry.
At Bid Writer Consultancy, we’ve helped hundreds of SMEs across the UK break through these barriers and secure valuable public contracts. Our experience has shown that success comes not just from understanding the technical requirements, but from crafting compelling narratives that showcase your unique value proposition.
Understanding the Procurement Process
Public sector procurement follows specific regulations designed to ensure fair competition and value for money. The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 govern most procurement activities in the UK, with additional rules applying to certain sectors.
Buyers must advertise opportunities above certain thresholds on the Find a Tender service, which replaced the EU’s TED system following Brexit. Lower value contracts might appear on Contracts Finder or devolved administration portals for Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
The procurement environment isn’t static. The Procurement Act 2023 introduced significant changes aimed at simplifying processes and increasing SME participation. These changes include streamlined procedures, greater transparency requirements, and a stronger focus on social value considerations.
Before diving into any bid, take time to understand the buyer’s procurement strategy. Some organisations bundle requirements into large contracts that favour bigger suppliers, while others break them down into smaller lots that SMEs can more readily tackle. Knowing this context helps you target opportunities where you have a genuine chance of success.
What Are the Stages in the Tendering Process?
The typical tendering process follows several distinct stages, each requiring different approaches:
1. Pre-Market Engagement
Pre-market engagement often begins before a formal tender is published. Buyers may issue Planned Procurement Notices (formerly PINs), hold supplier days, or publish draft specifications. These activities give you early insight into requirements and allow you to build relationships with buyers. We’ve seen clients win contracts partly because they engaged meaningfully at this early stage, helping shape requirements that played to their strengths.
2. Selection
Selection determines which suppliers are qualified to bid. This usually involves a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ) or Selection Questionnaire (SQ) focusing on your company’s financial standing, experience, and capabilities. Public buyers use standardised SQs, but the specific questions and evidence requirements vary.
3. Invitation to Tender (ITT)
ITT is where qualified suppliers submit detailed proposals. This typically includes method statements describing your approach, pricing schedules, and supporting documentation like policies and certifications. The evaluation criteria should be clearly stated, showing the relative importance of quality, price, and other factors.
4. Evaluation
Evaluation is conducted by the buyer’s team using the published criteria. Scores are assigned to each response, with feedback provided to unsuccessful bidders. Understanding how evaluators think is essential – they’re looking for clear, evidence-based responses that directly address their requirements.
5. Contract Award
Contract award is followed by a standstill period (usually 10 days) during which unsuccessful bidders can challenge the decision. Once this period expires, the contract is formally awarded and implementation begins. If this is a framework, there is often when account management and public sector sales focus kicks in – engaging with the framework organisations and understanding how you can best use the framework as a tool for your business growth.
Different procurement routes may compress or expand these stages. For example, open procedures combine selection and tender into a single stage, while competitive dialogue involves additional rounds of discussion between interim submissions.
Pre-Bid Qualification and Preparation
Not every opportunity is worth pursuing. Bid preparation consumes significant resources, so you need a robust qualification process to focus your efforts where they’ll yield the best returns.
Start by assessing the contract’s strategic fit. Does it align with your business goals? Will it help you enter new markets or develop new capabilities? One client initially pursued every available opportunity in their sector, stretching their bid resources thin and winning few contracts. After implementing a strategic qualification system, their win rate tripled.
Next, consider practical factors: Do you meet all mandatory requirements? Can you deliver within the specified geography? Do you have the necessary capacity and capabilities? Be honest about your limitations – bidding for contracts you can’t deliver wastes everyone’s time and may damage your reputation.
Relationship mapping is another vital preparation step. Who are the key stakeholders in the buying organisation? What are their priorities and pain points? Have you worked with them before? Strong relationships can provide valuable context that helps shape your bid.
Research the incumbent supplier if there is one. Are they bidding again? What’s their track record? Has the buyer expressed satisfaction or frustration with current arrangements? Understanding this dynamic helps position your offer accordingly.
Finally, analyse previous tender documentation if available. Freedom of Information requests can sometimes yield valuable insights into what worked for successful bidders. Look for patterns in the buyer’s priorities and evaluation approach.
What Do You Need to Have in Place to Win Public Sector Contracts
Bid readiness is key to success in public sector tendering. Procurement is fundamentally about risk management – buyers are trying to find the best supplier while minimising the chance of project failure.
Relevant experience is perhaps the most important factor in demonstrating low risk. You need to show that you’ve delivered similar services or products to comparable organisations, preferably in the public sector. Without this track record, buyers will question your ability to handle their requirements, regardless of how good your solution might be.
Evidence is crucial – client testimonials, case studies, and detailed contract examples all help build confidence in your capabilities. The strongest evidence includes quantifiable outcomes and addresses challenges similar to those the buyer anticipates.
Accreditations appropriate to your sector signal compliance and quality. These might include industry-specific certifications or more general standards like ISO 9001 (quality management), ISO 14001 (environmental management), or ISO 27001 (information security). Which ones matter most depends on your specific sector and what your competitors typically hold.
Robust policies covering areas like health and safety, environmental management, equality and diversity, and information security are often mandatory requirements. These need to be not just paper documents but evidence of embedded practices within your organisation.
Financial stability comes under close scrutiny, with many tenders requiring several years of accounts showing adequate turnover and financial health. Public bodies are wary of suppliers who might fail mid-contract, so demonstrating financial resilience is essential.
The specific requirements vary considerably by sector and contract value. A £5 million construction contract will demand different credentials than a £50,000 consultancy project. Research what’s standard in your market and prioritise developing the most important qualifications.
Decoding the Tender Documentation
Tender documents contain numerous sections, each serving a specific purpose. Missing or misinterpreting requirements is a common reason for bid failure, so thorough analysis is essential.
The Instructions to Tenderers explains the rules of the process – submission deadlines, format requirements, clarification procedures, and evaluation methodology. Read this section first and create a compliance checklist to ensure you meet all procedural requirements. Some tenders include seemingly minor formatting rules that, if breached, can lead to disqualification.
The Specification describes what the buyer wants to purchase. It may be output-based (describing the results required) or input-based (prescribing specific activities). Highlight all explicit requirements and look for implicit needs that might be addressed in your response. Note any areas where the specification seems unclear or contradictory – these may warrant clarification questions.
The Contract Terms set out the legal relationship between buyer and supplier. Review these carefully, especially provisions around payment terms, liability caps, intellectual property, and termination rights. Flag any terms that pose significant risk or would be difficult to meet.
Method statement questions require detailed written responses explaining your approach. Analyse each question to identify exactly what’s being asked and the underlying concerns the buyer is trying to address. Break complex questions into component parts to ensure you address all aspects.
When reviewing pricing schedules, understand exactly what costs should be included and how they should be presented. Some schedules can be deceptively complex, with different weightings applied to different elements during evaluation.
As mentioned above in the tendering stages section, don’t hesitate to seek clarification if any requirements seem ambiguous. However, frame your questions carefully – they’re visible to all bidders and might reveal your approach or concerns.
Developing a Compelling Value Proposition
Your value proposition must resonate with the specific needs and priorities of the contracting authority. Generic claims about being “high quality” or “cost-effective” won’t differentiate your bid from competitors.
Start by identifying the buyer’s primary drivers. Are they focused on reducing costs, improving service quality, achieving social value outcomes, or managing specific risks? Different stakeholders within the buying organisation may have different priorities – technical users may prioritise functionality while procurement teams focus on commercial terms.
Next, assess your competitive advantages. What makes your solution genuinely different? Perhaps you have proprietary technology, unique methodologies, specialised expertise, or an innovative delivery model. One client discovered their main differentiator was their staff retention rate, which was far higher than industry average and translated to better service continuity for clients.
Quantify the benefits of your approach wherever possible. Instead of saying your solution is “efficient,” calculate exactly how much time or money the buyer will save. Instead of claiming “high quality,” show how your quality control processes reduce error rates by specific percentages.
Substantiate your claims with evidence. Case studies from similar contracts, testimonials from comparable clients, performance data, and relevant accreditations all help build credibility. Remember that evaluators start from a position of scepticism – your job is to overcome this with compelling proof.
Tailor your value proposition to evaluation criteria. If quality and price are weighted 60:40, your messaging should reflect this balance. A bid that emphasises cost savings when the buyer is clearly prioritising quality will miss the mark.
Creating Persuasive Technical Responses
Technical responses or method statements form the heart of most bids. These narrative answers explain how you’ll deliver the requirements and create value for the buyer.
Structure is key to high-scoring responses. Use headings and subheadings that mirror the question and evaluation criteria. This helps evaluators navigate your answer and find the information they’re looking for. Remember that evaluators may be reading dozens of bids – making their job easier improves your chances.
Begin each response by demonstrating your understanding of the requirement and its context. This shows that you’ve thought about the buyer’s needs rather than simply recycling standard material. One client doubled their evaluation scores simply by adding brief context statements to the beginning of each answer.
When describing your approach, be specific about how you’ll deliver, not just what you’ll deliver. Include details of methodologies, processes, resources, and timelines. Some bidders provide good theoretical frameworks but fail to explain practical implementation.
Highlight relevant experience, but don’t simply list previous contracts. Explain what you learned from this experience and how it will benefit delivery of the current contract. Specific insights demonstrate genuine expertise rather than theoretical knowledge.
Address risks proactively. Identify potential delivery challenges and explain your mitigation strategies. This shows maturity and foresight, giving evaluators confidence in your ability to handle problems.
Bring your response to life with examples, diagrams, and case studies. Visual elements break up text and can communicate complex ideas more effectively than words alone. One particularly successful bid included process flowcharts with annotations explaining benefits at each stage.
Avoid jargon and overly technical language unless you’re certain the evaluators are subject matter experts. Plain English is always more persuasive than unnecessarily complex terminology.
Pricing Strategies for Competitive Bids
Pricing can make or break your bid, regardless of how strong your technical response is. Strategic pricing requires understanding both your costs and the market context.
First, ensure you’ve captured all delivery costs, including staff time, materials, equipment, overheads, and contingency. Breaking down costs by deliverable or time period helps identify any areas where you might be under or over-estimating.
Consider how the pricing model affects risk allocation. Fixed price contracts place more risk on the supplier, while time and materials arrangements shift risk to the buyer. Your pricing should reflect the level of risk you’re taking on.
Market research helps establish competitive benchmarks. What have similar contracts been awarded for previously? How are competitors likely to price? In one recent health sector tender, knowing that a competitor was willing to accept lower margins to enter the market allowed our client to adjust their pricing strategy accordingly.
Value-based pricing focuses on the worth of outcomes to the buyer rather than just your delivery costs. If your solution delivers £100,000 in savings or additional value, a price that allows the buyer to capture a significant portion of this value becomes more justifiable.
The evaluation methodology should heavily influence your approach. If price is evaluated on a relative basis (where the lowest price gets maximum marks and others are scaled accordingly), aggressive pricing may be necessary to remain competitive. If price is evaluated on an absolute scale (with bands for different price points), you have more flexibility.
Be wary of pricing too low. Apart from potential delivery problems if you can’t sustain the price, abnormally low bids may trigger additional scrutiny from evaluators concerned about quality or risk.
Quality Assurance and Submission Processes
A well-written bid can be undone by small errors or compliance failures. Rigorous quality assurance is essential before submission.
Create a compliance checklist covering all submission requirements: document formats, file naming conventions, word or page limits, font specifications, and required attachments. It sounds pedantic, but we’ve seen strong bids rejected for failing to follow basic formatting instructions.
Review content against evaluation criteria, ensuring you’ve addressed every aspect of every question. Score your own responses using the published evaluation methodology – this helps identify areas that need strengthening.
Check for consistency across all bid components. Technical approaches should align with resource allocations in the pricing schedule. Delivery timelines should be consistent throughout. Conflicting statements in different sections create doubt about your understanding and capability.
Reviewers unfamiliar with the bid development process can provide fresh perspectives. They’ll spot assumptions, jargon, and unclear explanations that those close to the bid might miss. Technical experts should verify that technical claims are accurate and deliverable.
Allow time for final proofing to eliminate spelling, grammar, and formatting errors. While minor mistakes rarely affect evaluation scores directly, they can undermine the professional image you’re trying to project.
Submit well before the deadline. Last-minute technical problems have derailed many bids. Most electronic procurement systems issue receipts confirming successful submission – make sure you receive and retain this confirmation.
Post-Submission Activities and Feedback Analysis
The period after submission offers valuable opportunities to strengthen your position and learn for future bids.
If presentations or interviews form part of the process, prepare thoroughly. Review your written submission, anticipate questions, and rehearse with colleagues playing the role of evaluators. Ensure your presentation team includes both subject matter experts and articulate communicators.
During the standstill period, request a debrief regardless of the outcome. Detailed feedback helps you understand strengths to build on and weaknesses to address in future bids. Even when you win, feedback reveals areas where you could have scored higher.
Conduct your own internal review while the bid is fresh in everyone’s mind. What went well in the preparation process? What could be improved? Did you have the right team and resources? This reflection helps refine your approach for next time.
If unsuccessful, consider whether a challenge is warranted. Procurement regulations allow suppliers to challenge decisions where proper procedures weren’t followed. However, challenges should only be pursued in clear cases of procedural impropriety, not simply because you disagree with the outcome.
For successful bids, ensure a smooth transition from bid team to delivery team. The promises made in your bid now become contractual commitments, so delivery staff need to understand exactly what’s been offered.
Maintain relationships with the buyer throughout contract delivery. Outstanding performance creates advocates within client organisations and positions you favourably for contract extensions or future opportunities. The tendering process doesn’t end with contract award – it’s the beginning of a relationship that can lead to sustained business growth.
Bid & Tender Writing Services
Professional bid writing services bridge the gap between your operational expertise and the specialised requirements of competitive tendering. Even organisations with extensive subject matter knowledge often lack the specific skills needed to navigate procurement processes and create winning submissions.
Bid writing consultancy offers various support models to suit different needs and budgets. These range from light-touch review and coaching to full end-to-end bid management and writing. The right approach depends on your internal capabilities, the complexity of the tender, and the strategic importance of the opportunity.
Our bid consultants work as an extension of your team, drawing out your organisational strengths and articulating them in ways that resonate with evaluators. This collaborative approach ensures responses are both compelling and authentic, avoiding the “generic consultant speak” that experienced evaluators quickly identify.
Specialist bid writers bring several advantages beyond writing skills. They offer objective perspectives, challenging assumptions and identifying weaknesses that internal teams might overlook. Their experience across multiple sectors provides insights into evaluator preferences and effective presentation techniques. And their focus on bid development allows your operational staff to maintain business continuity during the bid process.
The bid writing process typically begins with a structured kick-off meeting to gather information and align on strategy. Writers then develop draft responses for your review, incorporating feedback through multiple iterations. Throughout the process, bid consultants manage compliance, coordinate inputs from different stakeholders, and ensure all submission requirements are met.
Working with professional bid writing consultants significantly increases win rates for most organisations. First-time bidders typically see the most dramatic improvements, but even experienced bidders benefit from specialist support on complex or high-value opportunities. One construction client increased their win rate from 20% to 75% after engaging professional bid writing support.
Beyond immediate wins, bid consultancy develops your internal capabilities. Each supported bid becomes a learning opportunity, with knowledge transfer building your team’s confidence and competence for future tenders.